Revelation | A Christian Site About Religion, God, Jesus, & the Bible Articles and Answers about God, the Bible, Jesus, Religion, & Theology

Wow, this is perhaps the most shocking news story I have stumbled upon in my life. If you thought you had all of the answers about evolution and intelligent design (or creationism), then you will be in for quite a surprise. You may even find yourself changing your views on the origins of life after reading this (I know I have).

Apparently, a leading Harvard scientist has made a radical discovery in the human genome that promises to put the evolution and creation debate to an end once and for all. Here is the entire article below, and the in-depth interview:

In what promises to be the biggest discovery yet concerning the evolution and intelligent design debate, a leading Harvard scientist, Dr. Paul Damascus, has uncovered a new piece of evidence hidden in the human genome which will change the thinking of modern scientists and even those of faith.

Those with faith supporting the intelligent design theory have often long believed that a being or form of intelligence (God for example) created all life on Earth.

Secular evolutionists, however, have often scoffed at the notion in favor of the model of Darwinian evolution to explain the means by which life originated.

These two wildly different views have caused countless debates and arguments among the two sides. A new discovery, however, could put an end to this debate once and for all.

Dr. Paul Damascus: There is no doubt that the new evidence we have discovered will show once and for all that both intelligent design and Darwinian evolution model for all humans life is wrong. Neither is 100% accurate. I think both sides will be surprised by what we discovered.

Immanuel Iscariot: Can you please explain what the evidence has revealed? What was the big discovery your team made in the human genome?

Dr. Paul Damascus: Well, the human genome was widely viewed as being very similar among humans, with only a very small percentage of insignificant variation, even among different races. What we  have recently discovered is that there are actually 2 different genome types in the human race. These two genome types vary by as much as 40% in terms of genetic information.

Immanuel Iscariot: This finding has already been published by most leading news organizations and scientific publications, and is beginning to spread on the web. How did your team make this discovery?

Dr. Paul Damascus: We isolated over 5,000 samples of human DNA, and ran each sample through a computer program that isolates the amino peptide structure of certain genes, and then compared them to a database of samples using a complex algorithm and statistical analysis. What we found is that there are 2 very distinct types of human DNA, whereas scientists originally thought all human DNA to be virtually the same without a statistical difference.

Immanuel Iscariot: You say this discovery has implications for the theories of origins of life. So what exactly does this discovery lead you to believe concerning the theory of evolution and intelligent design?

Dr. Paul Damascus: Due to the statistical analysis performed, this clearly shows that one group of humans could not have evolved. Their genetic makeup is different from all other known species on Earth by a very large significance. The other group, however, could have very well evolved from lower life forms. So it appears that both the theory of evolution and intelligent design are both accurate. We can now say that one group of humans have evolved from lower life forms, or common ancestors so to speak (such as monkeys). While the other group shows clear signs of intelligent design, by some higher form of intelligence.

Immanuel Iscariot: So you are saying that some humans on Earth right now evolved from common ancestor monkeys, and the others were designed by a creator? A God so to speak?

Dr. Paul Damascus: Yes, that is correct.

Immanuel Iscariot: I would imagine that some individuals after hearing of this will want to know whether they have evolved, or whether their genetic makeup shows signs that they were designed intelligently. How can people find out?

Dr. Paul Damascus: Well, there are a couple of ways. The first method is DNA sequencing, and we would need to get a sample and test it in a lab against a database and look at certain genes to determine if the person evolved or was designed.

Immanuel Iscariot: Okay, so they can pay to have their DNA sequenced in a lab. What is the other way?

Dr. Paul Damascus: The other method is actually much easier. What we discovered was that those with the intelligently designed genomes have a predisposition to believing in God. So, for example, those who believe in a creator, were designed by one.

Immanuel Iscariot: So you are telling me that those who believe in God were designed by God, and those who don’t evolved from monkey-like common ancestors?

Dr. Paul Damascus: Yes, that is correct. So far our analysis has confirmed this to be true in every tested case. The reason is that in the intelligently designed genome, there is a gene responsible for the development of neurons in utero. These neurons are created in a way so that there is a sort of “packet” of knowledge hard-wired into their minds about a creator. This is similar to buying a computer that has the software pre-installed. They automatically believe creation by an intelligent being is more logical, therefore they believe in God.

Immanuel Iscariot: So what about those who evolved from monkey ancestors?

Dr. Paul Damascus: The humans with the evolved genome structures do not have this packet of hard-wired neurons. Therefore, they simply do not believe in their mind that they were created by a form of intelligence. In their mind, they are not very different from lower life forms. Some even act like animals, and enjoy the fact that they are very closely related to them. They even get really excited to hear any information that confirms that they evolved from monkeys and have no real purpose or meaning.

Immanuel Iscariot: So would the most famous scientists in history that helped revolutionize the field such as Isaac Newton, Francis Collins, Albert Einstein, etc. have this gene? They believed in God, so does that mean they were in fact intelligently designed?

Dr. Paul Damascus: Absolutely. Nearly all of the intelligent scientists who made real discoveries that helped increase our knowledge did in fact have this gene. They believed in God, therefore they had the genome that bears intelligence. Many of the scientists today do not make bold discoveries. Instead, scientific discoveries only gradually happen over long periods of time due to the lower intelligence of the leading scientists. It takes a longer period of time, and more secular scientists to make any type of discoveries.

Immanuel Iscariot: So what about modern day secular atheist scientists. Names such as Richard Dawkins, and others? Do they have the genome which suggests they are related to monkeys? They weren’t intelligently designed at all?

Dr. Paul Damascus: Well, I would use the term “scientist” very loosely if I were talking about them. They are probably more accurately described as teachers, speakers, or authors, and not scientists per se. After all, have they really done anything at all to revolutionize science like Newton?  But yes, if you want to call them scientists loosely, they could be an example of evolved scientists who do not have the intelligently designed genome. Therefore, they are in fact evolved creatures. They certainly weren’t intelligently designed by a God.

Immanuel Iscariot: What kind of impact do you think this discovery will have on the future of the human race?

Dr. Paul Damascus: Well, I think it will clearly put an end to the debate of creation vs. evolution. Evolutionists will realize that the theory only applies to them, and not the entire human race. Therefore they will try to stop evangelizing the theory to people who believe in God. Likewise, the intelligently designed race will simply stop debating evolutionists. They will no longer protest the theory being taught in classrooms, however, they will demand that the theory only be taught to those who  were not created by any form of intelligence.

 

I was in complete shock as I read this article. Who could have known that the whole entire time, some people actually did evolve, and some were created by the mighty hand of God? You learn something new every day I suppose.

Note: For those of you who may be “slow,” this entire article was a satire (that means a joke). It was completely made up.

Sponsored Links

Posted under evolution, science

Yesterday most news stations were reporting on a so called “missing link” which has been presented by a group of science researchers. This is something that evolutionists have longed searched for throughout the years (albeit unsuccessfully). Here is one of the things the articles said:

It has, among other things, opposable thumbs, similar to humans’ and unlike those found on other modern mammals. It has fingernails instead of claws. And by examining the structure of its hind legs (one of which is partly missing), scientists say they can see evidence of evolutionary changes that would eventually lead to primates standing upright.

Is Darwinius Masillae (Ida) Really the Missing Fossil Link for Darwinian Evolution?

LOL, what a joke. That is like saying because poodle’s have “hair” instead of “fur” they must be a direct link to human ancestors. Or since that cheese sandwich with Mother Mary on it that sold for thousands on eBay a few years back resembles Mary, it must have evolved from her too. Or since Ostriches walk upright, they too are a common ancestor of us. Give me a break people. Why do so many people get scammed by these non-sense claims & accept them as fact?

Common designs or patterns found among different species DOES NOT IMPLY evolution…DUH! If we use that twisted logic with anything in the real world, we can quickly see how it is dis-proven with ease. Many things (living and non-living) share common traits, patterns, and designs, however, we know they didn’t evolve from each other. Lighting has the same branching pattern as the veins in trees or our own body…Gee, we must have evolved from lightning too.

Not only that, but they somehow “know” that it is 47 million years old. I really wish I knew these people so I could borrow their time machine for a while. It would be nice to go back in time & invest in Microsoft & Google stock. I wonder why they don’t do that?

All kidding aside, these dating methods are a joke, and this whole thing is an assumption built on top of an assumption, built on top of another assumption, with a house of cards as the shaky foundation. Most dating methods are only accurate for a few thousand years, and even then they can be contradictory. They have no idea how old something is unless they themselves were actually there. Dating methods are flawed, and only used under the assumption that something in the universe hasn’t happened within that time which could affect the dating.

Most people simply can’t understand the concept of assumptions. They are blinded to think that any evidence or assumptions=truth. It doesn’t, not by a long shot. There are tons of things in life with no evidence, or very little evidence, yet are true. There are others with a ton of evidence to say one thing, but in fact the opposite is true.

No one on Earth right now, and I do mean NO ONE, knows what happened at the beginning, and how we got here. It is all faith based. You can put your faith in a mysterious big bang that “just happened”, or you can put your faith in a God causing the “big bang”. We will never be able to definitively know how it all started, or how it happened unless we jumped in a time machine, and that isn’t going to happen…EVER.

Many evolutionists are already jumping right onto the bandwagon and automatically assuming the few scientists that have had a chance to view this are correct, and this indeed is a “missing link”. I am quite frankly shocked that they still have not learned their lessons with this whole “missing link” claim non-sense.

All of the other “missing link” claims they have made in the past (such as “Piltdown man, Lucy, etc.) have already been proven to be either completely human, or completely monkey, or completely non-sense. In other words, they weren’t missing links at all like they were first announced! I would think they would have learned their lessons, but apparently not. It seems that scientists are so eager to label something as a missing link these days.

I personally can’t wait until this fossil gets categorized appropriately into the category it should be in (which should happen as soon as it has been objectionably viewed by ALL scientists). The whole thing will probably soon be labeled a hoax or error just like all of the other “missing link” claims in the past once someone with a clear mind views it. Oh well, I suppose history does have a way of repeating itself.

The funny part is that the fossil itself has already been discovered some 20 years ago, and apparently has just been disregarded as nothing significant, that is, until recently. My guess is that they are getting extraordinarily desperate & are looking for anything to label “Missing Link.” The track record for falsely labeling these fossils as missing links certainly has destroyed my confidence in any claims they make.

One article I read made a great point that the whole thing is a big publicity stunt, basically to sell their propaganda trash and to make money (There is a documentary that just magically happens to be coming out right now, along with other documentaries coming soon, and a book publishing…how convenient & perfect timing don’t you think). Seriously, if you don’t think they are going to profit off of this non-sense, you are kidding yourself. There is money to be made behind the whole charade. It is nothing more than smoke & mirrors labeled as science in an attempt at glory & money.

This is also probably an attempt to gain more “grant” money for continued “research’ (or as I like to say “fairy tale creating” by lazy scientists with big imaginations & tremendous faith). Seriously, some of these scientists have brilliant imaginations. I can’t help but feel like most have missed their calling. They should definitely be writing fiction works right now. It would be much more compelling in my opinion, don’t you think?

Why Do Seemingly Intelligent Scientists Want to Be Monkeys So Badly?

I really truly laugh at these evolutionists. They have more faith than any religious person I know in their “hairy” agendas. Seriously, they have more faith in evolution than most people have in God who are labeled as “religious fundamentalists (fundies)”. That is sad.

I have never seen so many intelligent people, be so incredibly ignorant, but I guess that is just how it is sometimes. Have you ever personally known someone who was brilliant at one thing in their life, but completely ignorant at another thing? I sure have! In fact I would suggest that we are all highly intelligent at one thing, but completely ignorant at another. I have known people that were brilliant at mechanical engineering, but can’t manage their finances or do their taxes to save their life.

I have known people who are incredible at sports, but can barely read. I have known people who can’t do a math problem to save their life, but can out-perform anyone in a school subject such as literature or writing.

And here we have seemingly reasonable scientists who just so happen to think they are monkeys (or at least a monkey’s uncle). If evolutionists/atheists want to be monkeys so badly, why on Earth do they not just strip off their clothes, get a banana, and hop around in the trees all day out in Africa or the rain forest? Seriously, go be monkeys if you want it that badly folks.

Or perhaps we could put them in a cage at the zoo, and then set up a really neat display with them typing on computers & stuff. That would be really cool. Maybe they can even throw their poo at people just like the “real monkeys” do!

As for me, I think God created me. If man can create a species in a lab without it having to evolve over hundreds of years (under the influences of natural selection, etc.), why couldn’t God? I believe I am something better than a monkey, and if man can intelligently design a species in its final form, so can God. You may wish to believe you are a monkey’s uncle, but not me.

I believe God created us separately. We may share a similar design, but that is only because we had a common designer. No friends, God made us special. He created us in His image. He gave us power & dominion & intelligence above all “beasts.” That is not something to take lightly.

Sponsored Links

Posted under evolution, science